<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Traditional Power Structures Still Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blurringborders.com/2009/08/05/traditional-power-structures-still-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blurringborders.com/2009/08/05/traditional-power-structures-still-matter/</link>
	<description>Tech Policy, Development and World Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blurring Borders &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not Every Digitally Mediated Act is a Political One</title>
		<link>http://blurringborders.com/2009/08/05/traditional-power-structures-still-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Blurring Borders &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Not Every Digitally Mediated Act is a Political One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurringborders.com/?p=627#comment-287</guid>
		<description>[...] of digitally mediated actions isn&#8217;t just due to the skeptics who rightly point out that traditional power structures still matter. The digital activism adherents also place too much emphasis on the case studies like the recent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of digitally mediated actions isn&#8217;t just due to the skeptics who rightly point out that traditional power structures still matter. The digital activism adherents also place too much emphasis on the case studies like the recent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Klein</title>
		<link>http://blurringborders.com/2009/08/05/traditional-power-structures-still-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurringborders.com/?p=627#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Your last point is the best. Quite a zinger. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Without watching the video (TED talks are short, I know; my attention span is shorter), it seems Brown is correct about the overarching effect of new technologies: Foreign policy can never be the same again. But his named cause -- instantaneous digital communication makes it necessary that the masses are heeded -- is off the mark, as you point out. Tech only changes foreign policy by adding just a little more time and political pressure to situations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consider this: If a US senator complained on Twitter that we weren&#039;t doing enough talking with Russia, it would be news for a half-day. If that same senator held a traditional press conference (or met with leaders in private), s/he would have a lot more impact. And that&#039;s the same US senator. People like us, even en masse, don&#039;t have the power to pressure like a few powerful people do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your last point is the best. Quite a zinger. </p>
<p>Without watching the video (TED talks are short, I know; my attention span is shorter), it seems Brown is correct about the overarching effect of new technologies: Foreign policy can never be the same again. But his named cause &#8212; instantaneous digital communication makes it necessary that the masses are heeded &#8212; is off the mark, as you point out. Tech only changes foreign policy by adding just a little more time and political pressure to situations. </p>
<p>Consider this: If a US senator complained on Twitter that we weren&#39;t doing enough talking with Russia, it would be news for a half-day. If that same senator held a traditional press conference (or met with leaders in private), s/he would have a lot more impact. And that&#39;s the same US senator. People like us, even en masse, don&#39;t have the power to pressure like a few powerful people do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Klein</title>
		<link>http://blurringborders.com/2009/08/05/traditional-power-structures-still-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurringborders.com/?p=627#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Your last point is the best. Quite a zinger. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Without watching the video (TED talks are short, I know; my attention span is shorter), it seems Brown is correct about the overarching effect of new technologies: Foreign policy can never be the same again. But his named cause -- instantaneous digital communication makes it necessary that the masses are heeded -- is off the mark, as you point out. Tech only changes foreign policy by adding just a little more time and political pressure to situations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consider this: If a US senator complained on Twitter that we weren&#039;t doing enough talking with Russia, it would be news for a half-day. If that same senator held a traditional press conference (or met with leaders in private), s/he would have a lot more impact. And that&#039;s the same US senator. People like us, even en masse, don&#039;t have the power to pressure like a few powerful people do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your last point is the best. Quite a zinger. </p>
<p>Without watching the video (TED talks are short, I know; my attention span is shorter), it seems Brown is correct about the overarching effect of new technologies: Foreign policy can never be the same again. But his named cause &#8212; instantaneous digital communication makes it necessary that the masses are heeded &#8212; is off the mark, as you point out. Tech only changes foreign policy by adding just a little more time and political pressure to situations. </p>
<p>Consider this: If a US senator complained on Twitter that we weren&#39;t doing enough talking with Russia, it would be news for a half-day. If that same senator held a traditional press conference (or met with leaders in private), s/he would have a lot more impact. And that&#39;s the same US senator. People like us, even en masse, don&#39;t have the power to pressure like a few powerful people do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

